Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished · Ohio

Carbo Forge, Inc.

Fremont, OH · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carbo Forge, Inc. runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade B.

Carbo Forge, Inc.: 2.2 TCR = 67% of Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carbo Forge, Inc. safety composite

Carbo Forge, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

Carbo Forge, Inc. injury rate improved

Carbo Forge, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Fremont, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 67% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/41
  • PHOTO Portland Forge - Leb…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Portland Forge - Lebanon, KY (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Carbo Forge, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carbo Forge, Inc. averages 2.2 TCR (67% of the Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carbo Forge, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Carbo Forge, Inc. falls in its industry

241 Steel forgings made from purch establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 41 Steel forgings made from purch employers in Ohio.

Carbo Forge, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Carbo Forge, Inc.
Carbo Forge, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Carbo Forge, Inc. has fewer employees than the Steel forgings made from purchased steel median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.2 2.1 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2016 3.7 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · OH · Fremont

241 Steel forgings made from purchased steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 90 employers in Fremont, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Portland Forge - Lebanon, KY 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arc Machine Co., INC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellwood National Forge Corry 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Presrite Technical Division 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gerber Farm Division 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDP Acquisition LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Potemkin Industries, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 259-NiSource-Springfield OH 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crown Battery Manufacturing Company - Fremont Manufacturing Location 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC INOAC Exterior Systems, LLC. Fremont 444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital 363 FTE
NAT-TCR Patton Avenue 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodland 119 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR National Beef Packing Company 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Univ of Missouri Kansas City 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Graham Roofing Incorporated 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodland 114 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propak - Oklahoma City, OK Plant 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Propak - Plainview, TX 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.