Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing · Florida

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville

Jacksonville, FL · ~89 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville runs at 100% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville: 3.3 TCR = 100% of Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville safety composite

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2016→2023

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville injury rate improved

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville's TCR fell 4.0 from 6.4 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.4 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 100% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #24/63
  • PHOTO USS
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~89 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: USS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cardinal Straw Jacksonville averages 3.3 TCR (100% of the Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville TCR series: 2016=6.4 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1 · 2020=2 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=1 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Cardinal Straw Jacksonville falls in its industry

2,838 Dinnerware, plastics (except p establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 63 Dinnerware, plastics (except p employers in Florida.

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville (89 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cardinal Straw Jacksonville
Cardinal Straw Jacksonville (89 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cardinal Straw Jacksonville has fewer employees than the Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2021 5.6 5.6 5 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2018 2.9 1.0 3 0 0
2017 5.3 5.3 5 0 0
2016 6.4 6.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · FL · Jacksonville

2,838 Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR USS 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AFCO-Avoyelles 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clayton Corporation 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood Industries Inc Hope 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bunnell 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Construction - Surf Club 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mental Health Diversion Facility 89 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIU Sipa II Phase 2 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Contech Sdfmp 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2840 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1965 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE OMi. Crane Systems Inc. 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8001 Carrolton Gateway Tire of Texas 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE MoA, Maint & Ops, Street Maintenance 89 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Commons 89 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.