Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing · Texas

Cardinal Straw Saginaw

Saginaw, TX · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cardinal Straw Saginaw runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Cardinal Straw Saginaw: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cardinal Straw Saginaw safety composite

Cardinal Straw Saginaw scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Cardinal Straw Saginaw held a steady TCR band

Cardinal Straw Saginaw's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Saginaw, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/161
  • PHOTO ORBIS Oconomowoc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ORBIS Oconomowoc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cardinal Straw Saginaw in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cardinal Straw Saginaw averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Cardinal Straw Saginaw TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Cardinal Straw Saginaw falls in its industry

2,838 Dinnerware, plastics (except p establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 161 Dinnerware, plastics (except p employers in Texas.

Cardinal Straw Saginaw (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cardinal Straw Saginaw
Cardinal Straw Saginaw (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cardinal Straw Saginaw has fewer employees than the Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · TX · Saginaw

2,838 Dinnerware, plastics (except polystyrene foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 36 employers in Saginaw, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ORBIS Oconomowoc 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otter Products - HQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otter Products - Head Quarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Plastics 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE LQ0706 Dallas - North Central 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radiant Plumbing and Air Conditioning 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LQ0963 Houston - Galleria Area 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE 02-San Marcos 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5316 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5316 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTI Foods, LLC. Soups 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ventura Foods Fort Worth 363 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hydration Source LLC #28 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midway Freightliner 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crystal Flash, Inc. - Marshall 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodtec 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.