Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing · Minnesota

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota

St Paul, MN · ~691 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota safety composite

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2021→2022

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota injury rate improved

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota's TCR fell 0.5 from 0.6 in 2021 to 0.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.6 · 2022=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · St Paul, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/56
  • PHOTO LSI Solutions, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~691 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LSI Solutions, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota TCR series: 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota falls in its industry

741 Instruments, mechanical micros establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 56 Instruments, mechanical micros employers in Minnesota.

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota (691 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota (691 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. - Minnesota has more employees than the Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · MN · St Paul

741 Instruments, mechanical microsurgical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LSI Solutions, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lake County 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philips- Minnesota 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwards Lifesciences 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 90060006 HQ 692 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&B Group St Michael 689 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carlson Building Maintenance, Inc. 693 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delta Air Lines - MS6 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Graff Faucets 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Burford's Tree LLC - 344 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TekSynap Corporation Headquarters 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 784 - Montgomery East 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 8805555-Sam's FC 691 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain FWN 691 FTE
NAT-SIZE MetroPower Inc 691 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Children's Hospital - Meyer 691 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.