Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing · Oklahoma

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City

Oklahoma City, OK · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City: 2.4 TCR = 61% of Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City safety composite

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City: 2.2 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.2 in 2021 to 2.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Oklahoma City, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 61% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #4/18
  • PHOTO Nutrition 101, LLC W…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nutrition 101, LLC Wilkes Barre (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City averages 2.4 TCR (61% of the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City TCR series: 2021=2.2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.9

Where Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City falls in its industry

756 Animal feed mills (except dog establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Animal feed mills (except dog employers in Oklahoma.

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City (41 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City
Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City (41 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Cargill Animal Nutrition - Oklahoma City has more employees than the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · OK · Oklahoma City

756 Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,293 employers in Oklahoma City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nutrition 101, LLC Wilkes Barre 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Butler Bakery Feeds 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryant Grain Co. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pilgrim's Douglas Feed Mill 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fresh Solutions, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Feeders LLC dba Hitch 1 Feedyard 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10 Hitch Feeders 1 Inc 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodward 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : OKC1 3,710 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OKC1 3,462 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony Hospital 3,417 FTE
CITY-NEAR OK005 3,027 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at the Shell 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodland Manor 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southeastern Employment Services, LLC. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 820 - Springwells 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jackson (Gas), MO 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE KW Industries East Bernard 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Lake Beckville Lignite Mining 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE SODEXO AT Promedica Panera Bread 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.