Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants · Texas

Cargill Meat Solutions 02

Friona, TX · ~2,229 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cargill Meat Solutions 02 runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade C.

Cargill Meat Solutions 02: 4.0 TCR = 120% of Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cargill Meat Solutions 02 safety composite

Cargill Meat Solutions 02 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cargill Meat Solutions 02: 3.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2019

Cargill Meat Solutions 02's TCR rose 2.5 from 3.0 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Friona, TX ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 120% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #12/19
  • PHOTO Perry Way Foods, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 205 inj
  • SIZE ~2,229 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Perry Way Foods, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cargill Meat Solutions 02 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cargill Meat Solutions 02 averages 4.0 TCR (120% of the Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cargill Meat Solutions 02 TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Cargill Meat Solutions 02 falls in its industry

212 Animal fats (except poultry an establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 19 Animal fats (except poultry an employers in Texas.

Cargill Meat Solutions 02 (2,229 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cargill Meat Solutions 02
Cargill Meat Solutions 02 (2,229 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Cargill Meat Solutions 02 has more employees than the Animal fats (except poultry and small ga median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 5.5 3.3 71 63 0
2018 4.1 2.6 51 48 0
2017 3.1 1.1 41 31 0
2016 3.0 1.5 42 29 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · TX · Friona

212 Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 15 employers in Friona, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Perry Way Foods, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Production 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWIFT PORK COMPANY WORTHINGTON 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyrum 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Methodist Hospital Dallas (MDMC-100) 2,225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brace Industrial Group 2,217 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXANT - SAN ANTONIO HUB 2,213 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXAUS11 DELL CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER 2,246 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primary Beef-Friona Tx 2,404 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI - 0079 Cargill Incorporated- Friona 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parmer County Community Hospital dba Parmer Medical Center 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR PSSI / CARGILL INCORPORATED- FRIONA 95 FTE
NAT-TCR DAV 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Redlands Automotive Services Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stark Carpet Corp 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-Swy 0025 2457 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lutheran Hospital of Ft Wayne Indiana 2,228 FTE
NAT-SIZE JBS Marshalltown 2,231 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoe Palace Corporation 2,227 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Ford Wyandotte 2,232 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.