Colleges, universities, and professional schools · Minnesota

Carleton College

Northfield, MN · ~1,598 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carleton College runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Colleges, universities, and professional schools workplace, earning a grade C.

Carleton College: 1.1 TCR = 82% of Colleges, universities, and professional schools BLS 1.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carleton College safety composite

Carleton College scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carleton College: 0.9 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2023

Carleton College's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611310 · Northfield, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #13/47
  • PHOTO Seattle University
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~1,598 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seattle University (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Carleton College in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carleton College averages 1.1 TCR (82% of the Colleges, universities, and professional schools BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carleton College TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=1 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=1.3 · BLS 1.4

Where Carleton College falls in its industry

347 Colleges, universities, and pr establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 47 Colleges, universities, and pr employers in Minnesota.

Carleton College (1,598 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Carleton College
Carleton College (1,598 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 617 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Carleton College has more employees than the Colleges, universities, and professional median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.3 0.8 10 0 0
2022 1.4 0.7 14 1 0
2021 1.2 0.4 9 0 0
2020 1.7 0.9 12 1 0
2019 1.1 0.9 9 0 0
2018 1.0 0.8 8 0 0
2017 0.6 0.3 5 0 0
2016 0.9 0.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611310 · MN · Northfield

347 Colleges, universities, and professional schools employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 66 employers in Northfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seattle University 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Josephs College of Nursing 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lincoln University 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE FV Ridges Hospital 1,588 FTE
STATE-SIZE Federal Cartridge Company 1,582 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hormel Foods Corporation 1,581 FTE
STATE-SIZE NMDP-World Headquarters 1,579 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Olaf College 1,917 FTE
CITY-NEAR Campbell Mill Northfield MN 627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northfield Hospital + Clinics- Campus 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR THREE LINKS 335 FTE
NAT-TCR Filtration : Filtration Innovation Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1064 West Perry School District 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dane & Associates Electric Co. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR RainMaster Lawn System 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1101 Home Office 1,598 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alton 1,598 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Methodist West Hospital (Katy, TX) 1,597 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.