Cards (e.g., business, greeting, playing, postcards, trading) commercial printing (except screen) without publishing · Minnesota

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit

Eden Prairie, MN · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cards (e.g., business, greeting, playing, postcards, trading) commercial printing (except screen) without publishing workplace, earning a grade D.

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Cards (e.g., business, greeting, playing, postcards, trading) commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit safety composite

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit: 4.6 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.06× in 2022

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit's TCR rose 5.6 from 4.6 in 2020 to 10.2 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Eden Prairie, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #95/121
  • PHOTO AmeriPrint Corporation
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AmeriPrint Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Cards (e.g., business, greeting, playing, postcards, trading) commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit TCR series: 2020=4.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=10.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit falls in its industry

2,001 Cards (e.g., business, greetin establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 121 Cards (e.g., business, greetin employers in Minnesota.

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit (21 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit
Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit (21 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Carlson Print Group - CFX Unit has fewer employees than the Cards (e.g., business, greeting, playing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.2 10.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.6 4.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MN · Eden Prairie

2,001 Cards (e.g., business, greeting, playing, postcards, trading) commercial printing (except screen) without publishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 242 employers in Eden Prairie, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AmeriPrint Corporation 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Communications LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harper Engraving 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Federal Direct 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Winthrop Agronomy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donahues Greenhouse 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE M7 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNLOG-SEL-SEL MN LOGISTICS' 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2573-MN051 1,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota 1,632 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fortra, LLC 1,367 FTE
NAT-TCR Pauly Toyota 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dsi Bulk Transport Co Inc 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LSFS Lawrenceburg, TN 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1172 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Canastota N/C Corporation 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 31 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwestern Machine & Hydraulics, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity Stainless Inc. 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.