Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Carlton Senior Living Fremont

Fremont, CA · ~111 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carlton Senior Living Fremont runs at 416% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carlton Senior Living Fremont: 15.8 TCR = 416% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carlton Senior Living Fremont safety composite

Carlton Senior Living Fremont scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.8

2023→2024

Carlton Senior Living Fremont injury rate improved

Carlton Senior Living Fremont's TCR fell 15.8 from 23.7 in 2023 to 7.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 23.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=23.7 · 2024=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fremont, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.8 · 416% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #517/635
  • PHOTO Crystal Terrace of K…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crystal Terrace of Klamath Falls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carlton Senior Living Fremont in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carlton Senior Living Fremont averages 15.8 TCR (416% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carlton Senior Living Fremont TCR series: 2023=23.7 · 2024=7.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Carlton Senior Living Fremont falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #517 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Carlton Senior Living Fremont (111 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carlton Senior Living Fremont
Carlton Senior Living Fremont (111 employees, TCR 15.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carlton Senior Living Fremont has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.9 6.6 3 3 0
2023 23.7 20.9 5 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Fremont

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crystal Terrace of Klamath Falls 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Neuvant House, Inc 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEL-Life at Kearney 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Legacy Pointe 15.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CNTRL 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterson Ranch 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE KLEEN HARVEST 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redding Cement 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR Upstate Farms Logistics LLC 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Uds 0371 (Smyrna - F) 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnsley Resort 15.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DGE4 15.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ascentron 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wisconic LLC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE CEI Michigan, LLC 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE KitPackers ResinLab 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.