Skilled nursing facilities · Florida

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation

Daytona Beach, FL · ~159 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation: 4.1 TCR = 63% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation held a steady TCR band

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation's TCR held near 0.2 from 3.8 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Daytona Beach, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #291/809
  • PHOTO Manor House Care Cen…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manor House Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation averages 4.1 TCR (63% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=3.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #291 safest of 809 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Florida.

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation (159 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation
Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation (159 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Carlton Shores Health and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.6 3.6 4 0 0
2018 7.3 0.8 9 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2016 3.8 2.6 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Daytona Beach

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 249 employers in Daytona Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manor House Care Center 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genacross Lutheran Services - Wolf Creek Campus 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Garden of Clearwater, LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avantara Lake Norden 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AgMart Produce, Inc. BALM CFL 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson-Davis Inc 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4407_9502 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mike Scott Plumbing 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Memorial Medical Center 2,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Daytona Beach 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMA Healthcare, Inc 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bethune Cookman University 682 FTE
NAT-TCR SWM/Blauer 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cox Trucking Newport 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seneca Foods Corporation - WI Central AG 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Senior Care of Marlandwood West 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lancaster EMS - LRMC 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE 109 - Oak Creek 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Janco Industries, Inc. 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Azek Building Products 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.