Housing, single-family, construction general contractors · California

Carmel Building & Design Inc.

Carmel, CA · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carmel Building & Design Inc. runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Housing, single-family, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Carmel Building & Design Inc.: 6.2 TCR = 163% of Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carmel Building & Design Inc. safety composite

Carmel Building & Design Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2017→2024

Carmel Building & Design Inc. injury rate improved

Carmel Building & Design Inc.'s TCR fell 8.0 from 13.7 in 2017 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=15.0 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=5.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Carmel, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 163% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #107/178
  • PHOTO Little Kading Constr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Little Kading Construction Company Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carmel Building & Design Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carmel Building & Design Inc. averages 6.2 TCR (163% of the Housing, single-family, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carmel Building & Design Inc. TCR series: 2017=13.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=15 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Carmel Building & Design Inc. falls in its industry

976 Housing, single-family, constr establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 178 Housing, single-family, constr employers in California.

Carmel Building & Design Inc. (23 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carmel Building & Design Inc.
Carmel Building & Design Inc. (23 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Carmel Building & Design Inc. has fewer employees than the Housing, single-family, construction gen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 9.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 15.0 10.0 3 0 0
2021 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 13.7 13.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · CA · Carmel

976 Housing, single-family, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 28 employers in Carmel, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Little Kading Construction Company Inc 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rotherham Construction Inc 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Phase Construction 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Living Contractors, Inc 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carmel Valley Ranch 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Lucia Preserve 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyatt Residence Club, Carmel 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carmel Valley Manor 149 FTE
NAT-TCR Oberlin 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR C054 Candlewood 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BBL Construction, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Guadalupe Regional Medical Center 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nashville Admin Unit 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springhill Suites Hillsboro 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Gypsum Weirton 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE GARDALL 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.