Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New Jersey

Carneys Point Generating Plant

Carneys Point, NJ · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carneys Point Generating Plant runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Carneys Point Generating Plant: 1.5 TCR = 122% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carneys Point Generating Plant safety composite

Carneys Point Generating Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carneys Point Generating Plant held a steady TCR band

Carneys Point Generating Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Carneys Point, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.5 · 122% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO Spruance
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spruance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Carneys Point Generating Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carneys Point Generating Plant averages 1.5 TCR (122% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carneys Point Generating Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Carneys Point Generating Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Electric power generation, fos employers in New Jersey.

Carneys Point Generating Plant (40 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Carneys Point Generating Plant
Carneys Point Generating Plant (40 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Carneys Point Generating Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2017 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NJ · Carneys Point

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 4 employers in Carneys Point, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spruance 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freestone Energy Center 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Turbine Maintenance Group 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MATHIS 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE- West Creek Operations 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flemington,NJ 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR NEW JERSEY 589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southgate Health Care Center 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kast Distributors 93 FTE
NAT-TCR Rollie Williams Paint Spot LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Walman Optical- Toledo 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TBI Contracting, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Division Jasper Office 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE McKinleyville Grocery Outlet 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE OMF St. Paul, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc. Orlando 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADESA Jacksonville 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.