Retirement communities, continuing care · North Carolina

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House

Sherrills Ford, NC · ~17 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House: 7.2 TCR = 191% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House safety composite

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House held a steady TCR band

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=24.1 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sherrills Ford, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 191% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #70/105
  • PHOTO Juniper Village at G…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Juniper Village at Guadalupe Riverfront (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House averages 7.2 TCR (191% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=24.1 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 105 Retirement communities, contin employers in North Carolina.

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House (17 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House
Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House (17 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Carolina Caring - Sherrills Ford Hospice House has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 12.1 12.1 1 1 0
2020 24.1 24.1 2 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Sherrills Ford

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in Sherrills Ford, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Juniper Village at Guadalupe Riverfront 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Vista Retirement Living - North Hill 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quail Ridge 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grace Woods Niles 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - NCE 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roanoke Tar Cotton, Inc. 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kinston Work Center 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE District Office 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1583 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trans Ash, Inc. - Marshall 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Duke Energy-Sherrills Ford 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Duke Energy - Sherrills Ford 26 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City Store #607 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S05392 - WM of St Louis - Desoto 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S03764 - WM of IL - West (Batavia) 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR R&B Grinding LLC 7.2 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.