Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Carolina Gardens of Conway

Conway, SC · ~43 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Gardens of Conway runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carolina Gardens of Conway: 7.8 TCR = 204% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Gardens of Conway safety composite

Carolina Gardens of Conway scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−267.8

2017→2019

Carolina Gardens of Conway injury rate improved

Carolina Gardens of Conway's TCR fell 267.8 from 277.8 in 2017 to 10.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 277.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=277.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Conway, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 204% of ind

  • DART 10.0 DART
  • RANK #56/107
  • PHOTO Arbors at Maplebrook
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arbors at Maplebrook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Gardens of Conway in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Gardens of Conway averages 7.8 TCR (204% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Gardens of Conway TCR series: 2017=277.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=10 · BLS 3.8

Where Carolina Gardens of Conway falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Carolina Gardens of Conway (43 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Gardens of Conway
Carolina Gardens of Conway (43 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Carolina Gardens of Conway has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.0 10.0 4 0 0
2018 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2017 277.8 138.9 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Conway

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 107 employers in Conway, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arbors at Maplebrook 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The VIllage at Regional West 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Bradenton Cove 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Riverwalk 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coastal Greenhouses, LLC -SC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Greenhouses - SC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seckinger Forest Products Inc 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Electric Cooperative 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horry County Government 2,603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Carolina University 2,364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conway Medical Center 1,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Corp of Conway 662 FTE
NAT-TCR CMS Mechanical Services LLC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Henry Schein, Inc. - Southeastern Distribution Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Union City (Whipple Road) 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Swn 07 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Headquarters 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Station 54 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE HHC - SR83 Project 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenneth D Zotti, Inc. 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.