Mechanical contractors · North Carolina

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc

Charlotte, NC · ~42 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Mechanical contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc: 3.7 TCR = 131% of Mechanical contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc safety composite

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2024

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc injury rate improved

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc's TCR fell 1.0 from 5.6 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 131% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #124/212
  • PHOTO Hoffman Mechanical S…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hoffman Mechanical Solutions, Inc - Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carolina Piping Systems, Inc averages 3.7 TCR (131% of the Mechanical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Carolina Piping Systems, Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Mechanical contractors establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #124 safest of 212 Mechanical contractors employers in North Carolina.

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc (42 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carolina Piping Systems, Inc
Carolina Piping Systems, Inc (42 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Carolina Piping Systems, Inc has fewer employees than the Mechanical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.8 3.4 2 0 0
2018 8.9 0.0 1 2 0
2017 5.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NC · Charlotte

5,793 Mechanical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hoffman Mechanical Solutions, Inc - Greensboro 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RRSC Miami 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Direct Inc 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Systems Plant Services, Inc - Nucor Huger, SC 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Vernon Hatchery 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPI USA NC LLC - Southport 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE-WMSTN 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Operations Center 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley Converting Co., Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LEESPORT 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 400 Retail 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rem Center Warehouse 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kolene Corporation 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bucks County Electric Works 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisher Auto Parts - FLRNKY 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.