Vegetable farming, grown under cover · California

Carpinteria Facility

Carpinteria, CA · ~75 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carpinteria Facility runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vegetable farming, grown under cover workplace, earning a grade D.

Carpinteria Facility: 6.0 TCR = 133% of Vegetable farming, grown under cover BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carpinteria Facility safety composite

Carpinteria Facility scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carpinteria Facility held a steady TCR band

Carpinteria Facility's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.8 in 2017 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.8 · 2018=10.3 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111419 · Carpinteria, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 133% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #11/19
  • PHOTO Columbia Care Florid…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Lakeland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Carpinteria Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carpinteria Facility averages 6.0 TCR (133% of the Vegetable farming, grown under cover BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carpinteria Facility TCR series: 2017=5.8 · 2018=10.3 · 2020=7 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Carpinteria Facility falls in its industry

251 Vegetable farming, grown under establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 19 Vegetable farming, grown under employers in California.

Carpinteria Facility (75 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carpinteria Facility
Carpinteria Facility (75 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Carpinteria Facility has more employees than the Vegetable farming, grown under cover median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 1.4 4 0 0
2023 4.9 4.9 4 0 0
2022 4.9 3.7 4 0 0
2021 3.6 1.2 0 3 0
2020 7.0 5.6 5 0 0
2018 10.3 2.3 9 0 0
2017 5.8 1.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111419 · CA · Carpinteria

251 Vegetable farming, grown under cover employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 45 employers in Carpinteria, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Lakeland 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harrisonburg Greenhouse 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Fresh LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Soli Organic Inc. - Harrisonburg Biofarm 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunset Farms, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Managment, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTVIEW BERRY FARMS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJRAS CORP DBA PRIME HARVEST CONTRACTING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 166 661 FTE
CITY-NEAR LinkedIn Carpinteria 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coastal Blooms Nursery, LLC 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuSil Technology, Carpinteria 322 FTE
NAT-TCR ShopRite Of West Nyack # 288 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S04126 - WM of NY Rochester Mt Read 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Berkeley Alternative School 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Muska Plumbing 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brimhall Elementary School 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Cannon Falls 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capt. Nathan Hale Middle School 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairmont City (Petra) 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.