Air conditioning system service provider · New Jersey

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield)

Fairfield, NJ · ~56 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) runs at 180% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air conditioning system service provider workplace, earning a grade D.

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield): 5.0 TCR = 180% of Air conditioning system service provider BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) safety composite

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield): 2.0 → 6.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 7.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2020

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield)'s TCR rose 4.6 from 2.0 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Fairfield, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 180% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #60/84
  • PHOTO Mechanical Systems
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mechanical Systems (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) averages 5.0 TCR (180% of the Air conditioning system service provider BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=3 · 2020=6.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) falls in its industry

5,793 Air conditioning system servic establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 84 Air conditioning system servic employers in New Jersey.

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) (56 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield)
Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) (56 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Carrier Commercial Services (Fairfield) has fewer employees than the Air conditioning system service provider median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.6 6.6 4 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 4 0 0
2017 5.8 3.9 3 0 0
2016 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NJ · Fairfield

5,793 Air conditioning system service provider employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 88 employers in Fairfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mechanical Systems 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westbrook Service Corp 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryan Fireprotection, Inc. - Indianapolis 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vision Mechanical 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cogen Technologies Linden Venture LP 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE- Bridgeton Operations 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE-Cape May Courthouse Operations 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Township Department of Water Pollution Control (Sewer) 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand AV Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1175 - Fairfield 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weiss-Aug Surgical Products 241 FTE
NAT-TCR Tmx2124 - San Jose 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1543 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 836 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FFD- Smyrna, LLC (dba Famous Dave`s) 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE KSWICH-OPI-WICHITA 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Highland Park 138 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE North American Lighting - IEP - Flora 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Visionary Sleep - Indiana 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.