Air conditioning products research, development and engineering · New York

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D)

Syracuse, NY · ~841 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air conditioning products research, development and engineering workplace, earning a grade D.

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D): 0.8 TCR = 162% of Air conditioning products research, development and engineering BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) safety composite

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) held a steady TCR band

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D)'s TCR held near 0.1 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Syracuse, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 0.8 · 162% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO SSRI
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~841 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SSRI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) averages 0.8 TCR (162% of the Air conditioning products research, development and engineering BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.8 · BLS 0.5

Where Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) falls in its industry

319 Air conditioning products rese establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Air conditioning products rese employers in New York.

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) (841 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D)
Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) (841 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Carrier Corporation (Engineering/R&D) has more employees than the Air conditioning products research, deve median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.8 0.7 7 0 0
2017 0.8 0.7 6 0 0
2016 0.9 0.3 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · NY · Syracuse

319 Air conditioning products research, development and engineering employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 436 employers in Syracuse, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SSRI 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virgin Hyperloop 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BASF Corporation - Shakopee 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimberly-Clark Corp Prototype X Mill 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6096 840 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hospital 843 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kolmar Labs 844 FTE
STATE-SIZE Briggs & Stratton LLC 837 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Health 4,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY 3,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center-SJH-NY 2,803 FTE
NAT-TCR NC.HIGHP.13 - Ricoh Usa, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CooperVision Caribbean Corp 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Abraham Baldwin College 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Greif Auburndale 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ITC 841 FTE
NAT-SIZE George's Cassville Processing Plant 841 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omaha Steaks JGB/O St 841 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-SW-20730056-FO 841 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.