Continuing care retirement communities · Maryland

Carroll Lutheran Village

Westminster, MD · ~425 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carroll Lutheran Village runs at 368% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Carroll Lutheran Village: 14.0 TCR = 368% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carroll Lutheran Village safety composite

Carroll Lutheran Village scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

11/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Carroll Lutheran Village: 7.7 → 12.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 25.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.77× in 2024

Carroll Lutheran Village's TCR rose 4.5 from 7.7 in 2017 to 12.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 25.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Westminster, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 368% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #78/87
  • PHOTO Stones River Manor
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 125 inj
  • SIZE ~425 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stones River Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Carroll Lutheran Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carroll Lutheran Village averages 14.0 TCR (368% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carroll Lutheran Village TCR series: 2017=7.7 · 2018=8.1 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=21.5 · 2021=25.6 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=22.7 · 2024=12.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Carroll Lutheran Village falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 87 Continuing care retirement com employers in Maryland.

Carroll Lutheran Village (425 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Carroll Lutheran Village
Carroll Lutheran Village (425 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Carroll Lutheran Village has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.2 10.8 14 12 0
2023 22.7 19.7 12 33 0
2022 8.3 7.7 6 8 0
2021 25.6 25.2 12 51 1
2020 21.5 17.6 20 34 0
2019 5.7 4.2 15 0 0
2018 8.1 7.8 24 0 0
2017 7.7 6.7 22 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Westminster

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 86 employers in Westminster, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stones River Manor 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Roseate, Inc. 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fellowship Terrace Villa 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solheim Lutheran Home 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 2233 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hughes Network Systems - Lakeforest (LFF) 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1985 426 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SMD1 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carroll Hospital Center 2,001 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carroll Hospital 1,697 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carroll Community College 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR English American Tailoring Company 326 FTE
NAT-TCR Oma-Ground Ops 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Commonwealth Health Corporation--All Other 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ICC 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American Highway, Becker 14.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Springfield Farms 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Fruit and Produce 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wagman Heavy Civil, Inc. 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gap Inc. - customer Experience Center in Longview 425 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.