Freestanding emergency medical centers and clinics · Nevada

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center

Dayton, NV · ~38 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Freestanding emergency medical centers and clinics workplace, earning a grade C.

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center: 3.9 TCR = 101% of Freestanding emergency medical centers and clinics BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center safety composite

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.4

2016→2020

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center injury rate improved

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center's TCR fell 15.4 from 15.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Dayton, NV ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/22
  • PHOTO Women's Health Cente…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Women's Health Center of Southern Oregon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center averages 3.9 TCR (101% of the Freestanding emergency medical centers and clinics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center TCR series: 2016=15.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center falls in its industry

498 Freestanding emergency medical establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 22 Freestanding emergency medical employers in Nevada.

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center (38 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center
Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center (38 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Carson Tahoe Dayton Medical Center has fewer employees than the Freestanding emergency medical centers a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 15.4 7.7 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · NV · Dayton

498 Freestanding emergency medical centers and clinics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 12 employers in Dayton, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Women's Health Center of Southern Oregon 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisconsin Specialty Surgery Center, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bux-Mont Endoscopy Center, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fair Haven 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vinco Nevada 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-NV-W Las Vegas-S Montessouri 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asia Union Electronic Chemicals-Reno, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE QUIKRETE - LAS 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 853 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR 706-00392 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bruce Aerospace 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carboline Dayton 43 FTE
NAT-TCR Roses 635 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sonic Equipment Company 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Union Tank Car Company - Valdosta, GA 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North American Chemical Corporate Distribution Center 2400 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Manufacturing Corp 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHD Roof Doctor's INC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roses 257 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE River Parish Maintenance at Occidental Chemical Taft, Louisiana 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.