MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Nevada

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building

Carson City, NV · ~63 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building: 0.0 TCR = 0% of MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building safety composite

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building held a steady TCR band

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Carson City, NV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO Culebra
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Culebra (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building falls in its industry

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 MDs' (medical doctors, except employers in Nevada.

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building (63 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building
Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building (63 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Carson Tahoe Medical Office Building has more employees than the MDs' (medical doctors, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · NV · Carson City

2,836 MDs' (medical doctors, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 123 employers in Carson City, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Culebra 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Urgent Care at Lake Lucille 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCH Medical Group - Roodhouse 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JCH Medical Group - Carrollton 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ovation Contracting, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE CMC Placing Reno 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eberhard Southwest Roofing, Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE US129: Las Vegas 435 - SG 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carson Tahoe Regional Medical Center 1,455 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redwood Materials 566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Nevada College 484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Click Bond NV 408 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CA-Solmetric 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HI-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NY-03 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trofholz 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thompson Concrete Foundations Ltd. - Ohio Division 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE DDSI Carson III 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marinemax East, Inc.-Cit 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.