County supervisors' and executives' offices · North Carolina

Carteret County Government

Beaufort, NC · ~671 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Carteret County Government runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical County supervisors' and executives' offices workplace, earning a grade C.

Carteret County Government: 2.9 TCR = 90% of County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Carteret County Government safety composite

Carteret County Government scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Carteret County Government held a steady TCR band

Carteret County Government's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.4 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Beaufort, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 90% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #20/47
  • PHOTO Civic Arts Plaza - C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~671 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Civic Arts Plaza - City Hall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Carteret County Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Carteret County Government averages 2.9 TCR (90% of the County supervisors' and executives' offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Carteret County Government TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=2.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Carteret County Government falls in its industry

1,010 County supervisors' and execut establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 47 County supervisors' and execut employers in North Carolina.

Carteret County Government (671 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Carteret County Government
Carteret County Government (671 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Carteret County Government has more employees than the County supervisors' and executives' offi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.6 1.8 15 1 0
2017 3.7 2.9 19 0 0
2016 2.4 1.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · NC · Beaufort

1,010 County supervisors' and executives' offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 17 employers in Beaufort, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Civic Arts Plaza - City Hall 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marquette County - Sawyer Service Center and Wastewater Treatment Plant 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR McMorran Place Arena 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Buffalo Lake 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyster-Yale Group, Inc., Greenville Manufacturing Plant 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Woodmark Corporation 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE 361393-CHARLOTTE NC P&DC 671 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4538_9896 616 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaufort Hospitality Enterprises LLC 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Veneer 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Safe Harbor Jarrett Bay 106 FTE
NAT-TCR Genesys Athletic Club 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Flint Group, Lebanon, OH 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops #508 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Progressive Green Meadows LLC DBA Green Meadows Health and Wellness Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE PITG 671 FTE
NAT-SIZE Poplar Bluff, Missouri Facility 671 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norstan Communications, Inc. - EP/MPLS* 671 FTE
NAT-SIZE Akutan 671 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.