Child group foster homes · California

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families

Camarillo, CA · ~293 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Child group foster homes workplace, earning a grade F.

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families: 9.0 TCR = 236% of Child group foster homes BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families safety composite

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2017→2023

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families injury rate improved

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families's TCR fell 9.1 from 13.0 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 13.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=13.0 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=7.7 · 2022=9.6 · 2023=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Camarillo, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 236% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #67/91
  • PHOTO Odydssey Residential…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 130 inj
  • SIZE ~293 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Odydssey Residential Habilitation LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families averages 9.0 TCR (236% of the Child group foster homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families TCR series: 2017=13 · 2019=10.5 · 2020=7.7 · 2022=9.6 · 2023=3.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families falls in its industry

560 Child group foster homes establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 91 Child group foster homes employers in California.

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families (293 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families
Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families (293 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Casa Pacifica Centers for Children and Families has more employees than the Child group foster homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.9 1.6 10 0 0
2022 9.6 1.8 16 0 0
2020 7.7 1.3 23 1 0
2019 10.5 1.2 34 1 0
2017 13.0 1.7 47 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · Camarillo

560 Child group foster homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Camarillo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Odydssey Residential Habilitation LLC 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boys Town New York 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family Health Center ZSFGH 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Monroe Campus 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE JVKS Harvest Solutions, LLC dba: AgSocio 293 FTE
STATE-SIZE Design 293 FTE
STATE-SIZE kdc/ one Sunburst 293 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hygiena 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-09 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 558 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State University Channel Islands 1,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Channel Islands Social Services 1,488 FTE
NAT-TCR Renew Consulting Inc 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Homeland 855 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Anthony Medical Center 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1284 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unique Custom Exteriors 293 FTE
NAT-SIZE MPM Health Care (2030) 293 FTE
NAT-SIZE Georges Live Production 293 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advantage Industrial Systems, LLC 293 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.