Garbage collection services · New York

Casella Waste Services, Geneva

Geneva, NY · ~56 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Casella Waste Services, Geneva runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

Casella Waste Services, Geneva: 6.0 TCR = 230% of Garbage collection services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Casella Waste Services, Geneva safety composite

Casella Waste Services, Geneva scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2024

Casella Waste Services, Geneva injury rate improved

Casella Waste Services, Geneva's TCR fell 6.6 from 10.6 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.6 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=16.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Geneva, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.0 · 230% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #38/73
  • PHOTO S04126 - WM of NY Ro…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S04126 - WM of NY Rochester Mt Read (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Casella Waste Services, Geneva in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Casella Waste Services, Geneva averages 6.0 TCR (230% of the Garbage collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Casella Waste Services, Geneva TCR series: 2016=10.6 · 2017=8.3 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=16.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Casella Waste Services, Geneva falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage collection services establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 73 Garbage collection services employers in New York.

Casella Waste Services, Geneva (56 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Casella Waste Services, Geneva
Casella Waste Services, Geneva (56 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Casella Waste Services, Geneva has more employees than the Garbage collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 16.8 14.2 13 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2018 5.1 3.4 2 1 0
2017 8.3 4.1 2 2 0
2016 10.6 4.3 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · NY · Geneva

2,322 Garbage collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 49 employers in Geneva, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S04126 - WM of NY Rochester Mt Read 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWS - Bullhead City 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05590 - WM of W Boylston 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Department of Streets & Sanitation - Bureau of Street Operations 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Arthur Kill Power LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG Arthur Kill Power LLC 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solar Communities Inc. dba SunCommon 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Orsted - New York City 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hobart and William Smith Colleges 2,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geneva General Hospital 798 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zotos International Inc. 603 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkel US Operations Corporation 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Montgomery Region 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Engineering, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 201 Santa Fe Drive 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE GADC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Senior Living at Stratford House 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albertville - 09 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelbyville - 07 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.