Couriers and Express Delivery Services · California

Caslo - San Luis Obispo

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~210 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Caslo - San Luis Obispo runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Couriers and Express Delivery Services workplace, earning a grade D.

Caslo - San Luis Obispo: 12.5 TCR = 192% of Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Caslo - San Luis Obispo safety composite

Caslo - San Luis Obispo scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 6.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2019→2024

Caslo - San Luis Obispo injury rate improved

Caslo - San Luis Obispo's TCR fell 5.9 from 13.0 in 2019 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=13.0 · 2020=15.1 · 2021=13.2 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · San Luis Obispo, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.5 · 192% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #442/710
  • PHOTO WAPUL - PULLMAN
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 97 inj
  • SIZE ~210 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WAPUL - PULLMAN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Caslo - San Luis Obispo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Caslo - San Luis Obispo averages 12.5 TCR (192% of the Couriers and Express Delivery Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Caslo - San Luis Obispo TCR series: 2019=13 · 2020=15.1 · 2021=13.2 · 2022=12.3 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Caslo - San Luis Obispo falls in its industry

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #442 safest of 710 Couriers and Express Delivery employers in California.

Caslo - San Luis Obispo (210 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Caslo - San Luis Obispo
Caslo - San Luis Obispo (210 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Caslo - San Luis Obispo has more employees than the Couriers and Express Delivery Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 6.4 9 1 0
2023 14.2 12.0 20 0 0
2022 12.3 9.1 18 1 0
2021 13.2 12.5 17 3 0
2020 15.1 12.3 18 4 0
2019 13.0 11.3 15 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · San Luis Obispo

6,679 Couriers and Express Delivery Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WAPUL - PULLMAN 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 858 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smiles for Miles, LLC 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXSTA - STAFFORD 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 3378_6551 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rincon Pacific, LLC 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodland, CA 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kern Harvesting Inc. 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR Wapul - Pullman 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR El Ahorro Supermarket #15, LLC 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of NIttany Valley 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 241 McKinney 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Midwest Transplant Network 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunny Grove Landscaping & Nursery Inc. 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Argosy Casino Alton 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cushman Plant 210 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.