Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Castle Creek

Castle Hayne, NC · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Castle Creek runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Castle Creek: 2.9 TCR = 77% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Castle Creek safety composite

Castle Creek scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2022

Castle Creek injury rate improved

Castle Creek's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Castle Hayne, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #58/356
  • PHOTO Brookdale Asheboro
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Asheboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Castle Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Castle Creek averages 2.9 TCR (77% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Castle Creek TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Castle Creek falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Castle Creek (35 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Castle Creek
Castle Creek (35 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Castle Creek has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 9.7 2.4 4 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Castle Hayne

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 19 employers in Castle Hayne, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Asheboro 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bellngham at Orchard A Memory Care 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10789 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Retreat at Albany 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Boykin Farms, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW COLONY SOW FARM 6276 -EST 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsboro Field Services 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butterball LLC Hatchery # 2 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeycutt Construction - Wilmington 137 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elementis Castle Hayne 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31827 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilmington North Operations Complex 58 FTE
NAT-TCR 2904-ASM-AR 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Y Foods, Inc. Ellington 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hauge & Hassain, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HG363 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foster Dairy Farms, Dairy #6 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shawnee Hospice 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matheny Motors - Kenova 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Science Central 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.