Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Illinois

Castle Manor Lincoln #552

Lincoln, IL · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Castle Manor Lincoln #552 runs at 449% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Castle Manor Lincoln #552: 17.1 TCR = 449% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Castle Manor Lincoln #552 safety composite

Castle Manor Lincoln #552 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Castle Manor Lincoln #552: 0.0 → 14.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 37.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.27× in 2021

Castle Manor Lincoln #552's TCR rose 14.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 14.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 37.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lincoln, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.1 · 449% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #207/217
  • PHOTO Broadway Creek Senio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Broadway Creek Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Castle Manor Lincoln #552 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Castle Manor Lincoln #552 averages 17.1 TCR (449% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Castle Manor Lincoln #552 TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=37.2 · 2021=14 · BLS 3.8

Where Castle Manor Lincoln #552 falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #207 safest of 217 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Castle Manor Lincoln #552 (57 employees, TCR 17.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Castle Manor Lincoln #552
Castle Manor Lincoln #552 (57 employees, TCR 17.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Castle Manor Lincoln #552 has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 14.0 4.7 3 0 0
2020 37.2 36.1 6 28 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IL · Lincoln

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 45 employers in Lincoln, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Broadway Creek Senior Living 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dogwood Trails 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Aspens 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autumn Cove 17.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Northern S - IL Gas Ops 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Concrete, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Centennial Contractors of the Quad Cities, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Carpentry, Inc. 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR LINCOLN IL 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abraham Lincoln Memorial Hospital 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lincoln Memorial Hospital 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 199 293 FTE
NAT-TCR Morgantown Health and Rehabilitation Center 17.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Douglas Health & Rehab Center 17.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Mills Complex (LMC) 17.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 568830-Mil-West Milwaukee Br 17.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rinker MIACP 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE IA - Monsanto (Des Moines) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Americas Resins and Global FM : Fayetteville 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norstan Communications Inc - Houston* 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.