Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC

Oro Valley, AZ · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC runs at 414% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC: 15.7 TCR = 414% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC safety composite

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC: 12.9 → 22.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 75.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC's TCR rose 9.6 from 12.9 in 2016 to 22.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 75.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Oro Valley, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 414% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #150/173
  • PHOTO Touchmark - TBND
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Touchmark - TBND (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC averages 15.7 TCR (414% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC TCR series: 2016=12.9 · 2017=14.2 · 2018=41.9 · 2019=18.4 · 2020=75.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=9.4 · 2024=22.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC (42 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC
Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC (42 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Catalina Springs Memory Care, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 22.5 11.2 8 0 0
2023 9.4 9.4 3 0 0
2022 6.7 3.3 1 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 75.7 60.6 7 13 0
2019 18.4 7.3 4 1 0
2018 41.9 20.9 10 2 0
2017 14.2 7.1 4 0 0
2016 12.9 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Oro Valley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 44 employers in Oro Valley, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Touchmark - TBND 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATHENS SENIOR CENTER LLC 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WL-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR WILMINGTON 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amber Ridge Assisted Living 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Verano CPG Winslow 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 260_450 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flagstaff Maintenance North 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flagstaff Forestry/IS 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ventana Medical Systems 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oro Valley Hospital 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3379 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Oro Valley 283 FTE
NAT-TCR River Valley 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrington Factory 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenosha Wi - 3127 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Station 72 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Philadelphia 10542 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso 10279 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buffalo 10239 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia 10612 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.