Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Catalina Village Assisted Living

Tucson, AZ · ~58 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Catalina Village Assisted Living runs at 349% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Catalina Village Assisted Living: 13.3 TCR = 349% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Catalina Village Assisted Living safety composite

Catalina Village Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−45.6

2016→2021

Catalina Village Assisted Living injury rate improved

Catalina Village Assisted Living's TCR fell 45.6 from 48.3 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 48.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=48.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 349% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #141/173
  • PHOTO Country Meadows of W…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Country Meadows of Wyomissing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Catalina Village Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Catalina Village Assisted Living averages 13.3 TCR (349% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Catalina Village Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=48.3 · 2018=0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Catalina Village Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #141 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Catalina Village Assisted Living (58 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Catalina Village Assisted Living
Catalina Village Assisted Living (58 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Catalina Village Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 48.3 4.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Tucson

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Country Meadows of Wyomissing 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard Park Senior Living Community 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Everett 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylorsville House 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Redhawk Power Plant 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Renaissance Companies 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE DSQ 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diversified Interiors Arizona 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Odana Rd. Thrift Store 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00949 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Smithfield Direct- Kansas City 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vancouver Police Dept East 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE North American Pipe 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 3 Lemon Grove 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Specialty Beverages 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lehman Roberts Plant 7 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.