Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Pennsylvania

CB Mining

Washington, PA · ~90 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CB Mining runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

CB Mining: 1.9 TCR = 90% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CB Mining safety composite

CB Mining scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CB Mining: 2.1 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.45× in 2024

CB Mining's TCR rose 0.7 from 2.1 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Washington, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 90% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #54/137
  • PHOTO Birmingham-Toledo, Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Birmingham-Toledo, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

CB Mining in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CB Mining averages 1.9 TCR (90% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CB Mining TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=1 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=1 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 2.1

Where CB Mining falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 137 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Pennsylvania.

CB Mining (90 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CB Mining
CB Mining (90 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

CB Mining has more employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 3 0 0
2022 4.4 4.4 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 2.1 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · PA · Washington

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 139 employers in Washington, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Birmingham-Toledo, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Road Machinery and Supplies - Bondurant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stainless Drive 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Durango WECO 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mechanicsburg Call Center 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Mile Paving, LLC 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.C. Lee Construction & Supply Co., Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bollinger Electric, Inc. 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Washington Hospital 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Meadows Racetrack and Casino 1,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood Casino at The Meadows 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Songer Services Incorporated 621 FTE
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Sunnyvale 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Extru-Tech, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverbend Annex 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Hills Apartments 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wiring Technologies Inc 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cummins Indianapolis Regional Distribution Center 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairview Care Center 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.