Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · California
C&C Utility, Inc.
Chico, CA · ~74 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 6.3
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
C&C Utility, Inc. runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade F.
C&C Utility, Inc.: 6.3 TCR = 227% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)
C&C Utility, Inc. safety composite
C&C Utility, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
33/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 6.35 per 100 workers
Safer than 14% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 0.88 per 100 workers
Safer than 41% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−9.8
2021→2024
C&C Utility, Inc. injury rate improved
C&C Utility, Inc.'s TCR fell 9.8 from 10.7 in 2021 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2021=10.7 · 2022=13.0 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.9
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 237130 · Chico, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 6.3 · 227% of ind
- DART 0.9 DART
- RANK #118/147
- PHOTO IHS:IVWST - IVWST-We…
- BOOK 4y book
- INJ 16 inj
- SIZE ~74 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: IHS:IVWST - IVWST-West Palm Beach, FL (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
C&C Utility, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- Texstar - Auro
Texstar - Aurora
6.4 TCR
- This site
C&C Utility, Inc.
6.3 TCR
- IHS:IVWST - IV
IHS:IVWST - IVWST-West Palm Beach, FL
6.3 TCR
- 460
460
6.3 TCR
- LC046 - Chesap
LC046 - Chesapeake VA
6.3 TCR
What this shows C&C Utility, Inc. averages 6.3 TCR (227% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).
C&C Utility, Inc. TCR series: 2021=10.7 · 2022=13 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.8
Where C&C Utility, Inc. falls in its industry
1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishmentsSafer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 147 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in California.
C&C Utility, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 13.0 | 9.4 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
237130 · CA · Chico
1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 189 employers in Chico, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | IHS:IVWST - IVWST-West Palm Beach, FL | 6.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | 460 | 6.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | LC046 - Chesapeake VA | 6.3 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Texstar - Aurora | 6.4 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Wonderful Orchards-New Columbia | 74 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Apricot Lane Farms | 74 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Central California Almond Growers (Kerman) | 74 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Jose Jesus Garcia Jr | 74 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | CA-11 | 4,124 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Enloe Medical Center Employees | 3,831 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | California Department of Transportation Facility 72 | 2,394 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | California Department of Transportation Facility 521 | 2,370 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Amazon.com Services LLC - DWO1 | 6.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Amazon.com Services LLC - PDX5 | 6.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Coral Oaks | 6.3 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Mabak Directional Drilling, Inc | 6.3 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Green Bay Packaging - Wisconsin Packaging Division | 74 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | 010 Shared Services | 74 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | 3341 - Champaign Campustown | 74 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Mn3 Med - Brooklyn Park | 74 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.