Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Ohio

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin)

Wooster, OH · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) runs at 454% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade F.

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin): 17.3 TCR = 454% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) safety composite

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin): 9.0 → 25.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 25.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2017

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin)'s TCR rose 16.5 from 9.0 in 2016 to 25.5 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Wooster, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.3 · 454% of ind

  • DART 10.2 DART
  • RANK #13/13
  • PHOTO 483399 FL 3701 AVALO…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 483399 FL 3701 AVALON PARK W BOULEVARD (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) averages 17.3 TCR (454% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=25.5 · BLS 3.8

Where CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 13 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Ohio.

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) (94 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin)
CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) (94 employees, TCR 17.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

CCHO Main Campus (CRC & Admin) has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 25.5 10.2 25 0 0
2016 9.0 3.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · OH · Wooster

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 133 employers in Wooster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 483399 FL 3701 AVALON PARK W BOULEVARD 17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-566604 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningstar Children and Family Services 17.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-482412 17.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE K.W. Zellers & Son, Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scherzinger Pest Control 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE AEP Energy Contact Center 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTERN - WEST PARK SHOP 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scaheffler Transmissions LLC 1,907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LuK USA LLC 1,814 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schaeffler Transmission LLC 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR College of Wooster 771 FTE
NAT-TCR MBK - Chancellor Gardens 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 054525-Lax-Greenmead Sta 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fircrest School 17.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets Redmond 17.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accent Display Corp. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salude - The Art of Rceovery 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cei Dallas Tecta America Company 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryerson- Los Angeles 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.