Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing · Oregon

CCNA Portland Branch

Portland, OR · ~38 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CCNA Portland Branch runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

CCNA Portland Branch: 1.7 TCR = 50% of Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CCNA Portland Branch safety composite

CCNA Portland Branch scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2020

CCNA Portland Branch injury rate improved

CCNA Portland Branch's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 312111 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO Kraft Heinz Foods Co…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kraft Heinz Foods Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

CCNA Portland Branch in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CCNA Portland Branch averages 1.7 TCR (50% of the Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CCNA Portland Branch TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CCNA Portland Branch falls in its industry

516 Beverages, soft drink (includi establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Beverages, soft drink (includi employers in Oregon.

CCNA Portland Branch (38 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CCNA Portland Branch
CCNA Portland Branch (38 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 149 employees and a TCR of 4.8

CCNA Portland Branch has fewer employees than the Beverages, soft drink (including artific median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

312111 · OR · Portland

516 Beverages, soft drink (including artificially carbonated waters), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kraft Heinz Foods Company 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlottesville Location 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCCB 1L16 PHILADELPHIA PRODUCTION CTR 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 051-PL001 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BNW North Powder 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&L ZX Ranch - Paisley 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gyppo, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer HES2 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Johnson Elementary School 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1601 Plaza Way 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ON Semiconductor Western Ave 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer Store 123 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC - Sublette 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Office for Klein Contracting Corporation 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fort Polk Commissary 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Food 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.