Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Oregon

CD Redding Construction

Salem, OR · ~29 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CD Redding Construction runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

CD Redding Construction: 6.5 TCR = 222% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CD Redding Construction safety composite

CD Redding Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CD Redding Construction: 8.4 → 10.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

CD Redding Construction's TCR rose 1.9 from 8.4 in 2016 to 10.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Salem, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 222% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/95
  • PHOTO Longhorn Mechanical
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Longhorn Mechanical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

CD Redding Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CD Redding Construction averages 6.5 TCR (222% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CD Redding Construction TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=10.3 · BLS 2.9

Where CD Redding Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 95 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Oregon.

CD Redding Construction (29 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate CD Redding Construction
CD Redding Construction (29 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

CD Redding Construction has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 10.3 0.0 4 0 0
2019 6.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OR · Salem

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Longhorn Mechanical 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wobig Construction Co, Inc 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Four Petroleum Group, LLC 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wells and West General Contractors, Inc. 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE GardenScape Nursery INC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coleman Ag 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Administration Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Port Westward 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR Alden Valley Ridge Rehab 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alden Village 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Luke's Hospital of Duluth 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR E.D. Chase Company Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kent Outlet 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wimsatt Building Materials - Grand Rapids 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE The tru Shrimp Company 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schayes, Inc dba New York Sash 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.