Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers · Texas

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc.

Houston, TX · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc.: 5.4 TCR = 244% of Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. safety composite

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.9

2017→2022

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. injury rate improved

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 9.9 from 9.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.9 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.4 · 244% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/101
  • PHOTO Alumisource Corporat…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alumisource Corporation- Monessen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. averages 5.4 TCR (244% of the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=9.9 · 2018=9.6 · 2019=3 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.2

Where C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 101 Metal scrap and waste merchant employers in Texas.

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. (38 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc.
C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. (38 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

C&D Scrap Metal Recyclers Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesale median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 9.6 6.4 3 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 9.6 3.2 3 0 0
2017 9.9 3.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · TX · Houston

1,126 Metal scrap and waste merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alumisource Corporation- Monessen 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AIM Recycling Cleveland, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR D&W Salvage, Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Management Midwest, Artesian 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS MT. PLEASANT BREEDER AND BROILER 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Agricultural- Danevang 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2362/3714-Lubbock, TX-R&D (Monsanto Co.) 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Aurora Cooperative - Aurora Agronomy 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR WA-Bremerton 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR California Pacific Medical Center (274-CC-VN2) 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR el super 26 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE buybuy Baby Braintree 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bed Bath and Beyond Chicago Ridge 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bed Bath and Beyond Chesapeake 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bed Bath and Beyond Exton 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.