Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Wisconsin

CDC Logistics, LLC

Mount Pleasant, WI · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CDC Logistics, LLC runs at 261% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

CDC Logistics, LLC: 17.0 TCR = 261% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CDC Logistics, LLC safety composite

CDC Logistics, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CDC Logistics, LLC: 11.4 → 28.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 28.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

CDC Logistics, LLC's TCR rose 16.6 from 11.4 in 2022 to 28.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Mount Pleasant, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.0 · 261% of ind

  • DART 20.7 DART
  • RANK #100/113
  • PHOTO 849
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 849 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

CDC Logistics, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CDC Logistics, LLC averages 17.0 TCR (261% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CDC Logistics, LLC TCR series: 2022=11.4 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=28.1 · BLS 6.5

Where CDC Logistics, LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 113 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Wisconsin.

CDC Logistics, LLC (71 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate CDC Logistics, LLC
CDC Logistics, LLC (71 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

CDC Logistics, LLC has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 28.1 20.7 19 0 0
2023 11.5 6.6 7 0 0
2022 11.4 8.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · WI · Mount Pleasant

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 15 employers in Mount Pleasant, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 849 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 926 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dubolyu Logistics Inc 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 379 17.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Renk Seed Company 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrated Process Engineers & Constructors, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Samuels Group, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rural Masonry Co Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foxconn Industrial Internet 961 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEDA - North America Headquarters 247 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seda North America, Inc. 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR 534-00891 145 FTE
NAT-TCR Adult Learning Systems-U.P. 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Landings of Canton Hills 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ascentist ASC Merriam, LLC 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona DC12 17.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE iDeliver Ontime LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graham Trucking Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE LRS - Heartland 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE LRS - Wauconda 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.