Electrical contractors · Kansas

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors

Pittsburg, KS · ~184 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors: 1.9 TCR = 66% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors safety composite

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors held a steady TCR band

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.7 in 2019 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.7 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Pittsburg, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #14/41
  • PHOTO Brayer Electric Comp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~184 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brayer Electric Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors averages 1.9 TCR (66% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors TCR series: 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 2.8

Where CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 41 Electrical contractors employers in Kansas.

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors (184 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors
CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors (184 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

CDL Electric - Building Equipment Contractors has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.6 4 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2022 1.3 0.6 2 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 4 0 0
2020 1.9 1.4 4 0 0
2019 2.7 1.3 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · KS · Pittsburg

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 70 employers in Pittsburg, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brayer Electric Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Rice-Tinsley Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electrical Solar and Lighting, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fleming Network & Security Services Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door of Kansas City 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE COF Training Services, Inc. 184 FTE
STATE-SIZE Higgins Group, Inc. 185 FTE
STATE-SIZE MJE, LLC 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Health Center of Southeast Kansas 1,083 FTE
CITY-NEAR WATC Support Services 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC001 523 FTE
CITY-NEAR 72 347 FTE
NAT-TCR Cascades Recovery+, a division of Cascades New York Inc. (Rochester) 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gregori Construction - Florida 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Robert Alan Construction, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Isolatek-Stanhope 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE AmbioPharm, Inc. 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Napoleon Avenue 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schuette Metals 184 FTE
NAT-SIZE Piquette & Howard Electric Service, LLC 184 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.