Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Illinois

CED Main

Downers Grove, IL · ~149 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CED Main runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CED Main: 1.0 TCR = 31% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CED Main safety composite

CED Main scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2024

CED Main injury rate improved

CED Main's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.7 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Downers Grove, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #6/16
  • PHOTO J. A. Reinhardt & Co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~149 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J. A. Reinhardt & Co., Inc. (Mountainhome PA) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

CED Main in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CED Main averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CED Main TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where CED Main falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 16 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Illinois.

CED Main (149 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CED Main
CED Main (149 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

CED Main has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.4 1 1 0
2023 1.1 0.5 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 0 1 0
2020 3.2 2.5 1 4 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.7 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · IL · Downers Grove

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 139 employers in Downers Grove, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J. A. Reinhardt & Co., Inc. (Mountainhome PA) 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtiss Wright Actuation Systems 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boom Super Sonic 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brazonics, Inc. (Hampton NH) 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mount Prospect 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plocher Construction Company 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broeren Russo Construction, Inc. 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illinois Regional Office - Larson 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocate Medical Group 5,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocate Support Centers 2,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocate Good Samaritan Hospital 1,958 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVOCATE CHILDRENS HOSPITALS 1,734 FTE
NAT-TCR 5456 - Oklahoma City 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Lift Truck Co., Inc. Br18 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Merit Erectors, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Reading Plant 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Momentum WORK, Inc. (Santa Maria) 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Colonial Oil Industries, Savannah 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terrace Heights 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ruggable Charlotte 149 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.