Academies, elementary or secondary · Minnesota

Cedar Creek Elementary School

Cedar, MN · ~110 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Creek Elementary School runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Academies, elementary or secondary workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedar Creek Elementary School: 3.6 TCR = 259% of Academies, elementary or secondary BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Creek Elementary School safety composite

Cedar Creek Elementary School scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Creek Elementary School: 4.5 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2024

Cedar Creek Elementary School's TCR rose 1.2 from 4.5 in 2019 to 5.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Cedar, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 3.6 · 259% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #805/1589
  • PHOTO Skyview Middle School
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Skyview Middle School (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Creek Elementary School in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Creek Elementary School averages 3.6 TCR (259% of the Academies, elementary or secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Creek Elementary School TCR series: 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.1 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.7 · BLS 1.4

Where Cedar Creek Elementary School falls in its industry

3,374 Academies, elementary or secon establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #805 safest of 1589 Academies, elementary or secon employers in Minnesota.

Cedar Creek Elementary School (110 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Creek Elementary School
Cedar Creek Elementary School (110 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Cedar Creek Elementary School has more employees than the Academies, elementary or secondary median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.7 4.2 3 1 0
2023 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2022 7.1 4.3 5 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · MN · Cedar

3,374 Academies, elementary or secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 5 employers in Cedar, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Skyview Middle School 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centralia Junior High School 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nellie Stone Johnson 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond Community Schools-Vaile Elementary 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cargill Animal Nutrition Innovation Campus 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis SE Storage 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shaw-Lundquist Associates Inc. 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE All Energy Solar - MN 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aggressive Hydraulics, Inc. 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR EARLY CHILDHOOD FAMILY CENTER 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tamarack Cedar 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tamarack - Cedar 34 FTE
NAT-TCR CSP Darlington 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WIC Austin Hutto Branch 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Patty Processing, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Waste Stream, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Paper - McAllen Container 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc. 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coal Valley 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE City/Suddath Relocation Systems, LLC (Microsoft) 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.