Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Cedar Creek Senior Living

Madera, CA · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Creek Senior Living runs at 340% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedar Creek Senior Living: 12.9 TCR = 340% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Creek Senior Living safety composite

Cedar Creek Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2023→2024

Cedar Creek Senior Living injury rate improved

Cedar Creek Senior Living's TCR fell 2.7 from 14.3 in 2023 to 11.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=14.3 · 2024=11.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Madera, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 340% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #157/216
  • PHOTO Quincy Village
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quincy Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Creek Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Creek Senior Living averages 12.9 TCR (340% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Creek Senior Living TCR series: 2023=14.3 · 2024=11.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedar Creek Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Cedar Creek Senior Living (60 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Creek Senior Living
Cedar Creek Senior Living (60 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cedar Creek Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.6 7.7 3 0 0
2023 14.3 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Madera

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quincy Village 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Evergreen Place Supportive Living- Streator 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Memphis 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living Lakewood Ranch 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Coast Vineyards 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming Cooperative, Inc | Grapes Delano 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paiva Farm Management 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rocket Farms Herbs Inc Thermal 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR ASB Global LLC 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Florence Ky - 3359 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Marin Transystems Inc 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northmoor Rehabilitation and Health Care Center 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wcis LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadow Ridge Senior Living 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE KEI Electrical Construction and Maintenance, Inc. 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tiffany Heights 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.