Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Iowa

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15

Cedar Falls, IA · ~96 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15: 11.8 TCR = 358% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 safety composite

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15: 4.3 → 8.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 26.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15's TCR rose 4.6 from 4.3 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Cedar Falls, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 358% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #7/11
  • PHOTO AZZ Galvanizing - De…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AZZ Galvanizing - Denver (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 averages 11.8 TCR (358% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=13.7 · 2019=13.3 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=26.2 · 2023=17.8 · 2024=8.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 11 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Iowa.

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 (96 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15
Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 (96 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Cedar Falls, IA - MK Plant 15 has more employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.9 6.7 8 0 0
2023 17.8 13.8 15 3 0
2022 26.2 17.5 24 0 0
2021 6.6 4.9 8 0 0
2020 9.9 7.9 10 0 0
2019 13.3 9.2 15 1 0
2018 13.7 12.9 10 6 0
2017 5.6 3.4 5 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · IA · Cedar Falls

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 88 employers in Cedar Falls, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AZZ Galvanizing - Denver 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midland PA 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Finishing Systems - Mosinee 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterloo Service Center 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE 7123_18981 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Architectural Wall Systems, LLC 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE US093: Indianapolis 331 - SG 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Deere Waterloo Works Product Engineering Center 1,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0590 - Cedar Falls IA DC 1,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0590 - Cedar Falls DC 936 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Home Services 752 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacksonville Plant 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mdot Maint Gar Auburn Hls-Mdot 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The HT Hackney Co 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MACCRAY School District 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4215 - Plano Prehung Plant 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMZL-NA : Eagles Routes LLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Haulers LLC Calera Terminal 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plano Dc Flatbed - 3239 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.