Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Cedar Mountain House

Brevard, NC · ~26 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Mountain House runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedar Mountain House: 8.3 TCR = 220% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Mountain House safety composite

Cedar Mountain House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Mountain House: 11.2 → 14.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 31.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2024

Cedar Mountain House's TCR rose 3.4 from 11.2 in 2016 to 14.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 31.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Brevard, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 220% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #248/356
  • PHOTO The Cambridge Homes
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Cambridge Homes (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Mountain House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Mountain House averages 8.3 TCR (220% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Mountain House TCR series: 2016=11.2 · 2017=31.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=13.5 · 2024=14.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedar Mountain House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #248 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Cedar Mountain House (26 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Mountain House
Cedar Mountain House (26 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cedar Mountain House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.5 9.7 3 0 0
2023 13.5 9.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 31.5 26.2 6 0 0
2016 11.2 11.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Brevard

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Brevard, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Cambridge Homes 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Cottagewood Buffalo MC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Ivy at Golden Gate 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Alexandria 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yarbrough Farms LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH LNM- EST 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR MH Transylvania Regional Hospital, LLLP 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaia Herbs 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 067 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tranysylvania Vocational Services, Inc. 188 FTE
NAT-TCR RRSC Omaha 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Adam Roe Painting, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 003 Plaza Las Americas 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Ivy at Golden Gate 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6000-DRC-BIDDEFORD 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3900-DRC-ROCKLAND 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gordon Bernard Co., LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE All Recycling North 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.