General medical and surgical hospitals · Texas

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center

Cedar Park, TX · ~392 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade A.

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center: 3.5 TCR = 46% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center safety composite

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2016→2024

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center injury rate improved

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center's TCR fell 5.2 from 7.6 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=5.0 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Cedar Park, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #158/520
  • PHOTO MedCentral Hospital
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 112 inj
  • SIZE ~392 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MedCentral Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Park Regional Medical Center averages 3.5 TCR (46% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=5 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=5 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 7.5

Where Cedar Park Regional Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #158 safest of 520 General medical and surgical h employers in Texas.

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center (392 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Park Regional Medical Center
Cedar Park Regional Medical Center (392 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Cedar Park Regional Medical Center has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 1.2 8 9 0
2023 5.0 0.1 35 0 0
2022 7.5 0.8 46 4 0
2021 5.0 1.9 21 10 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · Cedar Park

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 94 employers in Cedar Park, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MedCentral Hospital 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mercy Perrysburg Hospital 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Presbyterian Espanola Hospital 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Joseph's Hospital of Buckhannon 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE STANTON TOWERS 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bobcat Contracting LLC 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE SER Construction Partners, LLC 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Foods 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2991 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2991 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2342 - Cedar Park 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR C C Carlton Industries 304 FTE
NAT-TCR CV East LLC - CVE 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Prime Now LLC - UTN1 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Presbyterian Espanola Hospital 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hormann LLC - Montgomery 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Community Health Group 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE Freedom Pointe at The Villages 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adventist HealthCare Fort Washington Medical Center, Inc. 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Chester 392 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.