Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Georgia

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation

Cedartown, GA · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade C.

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation: 7.0 TCR = 108% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2018→2019

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation injury rate improved

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation's TCR fell 4.5 from 9.3 in 2018 to 4.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.3 · 2019=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Cedartown, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.0 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #118/259
  • PHOTO Redwood LTC Group, L…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Redwood LTC Group, LLC d/b/a Premier Nursing & Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation averages 7.0 TCR (108% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2018=9.3 · 2019=4.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #118 safest of 259 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Georgia.

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation (67 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation
Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation (67 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cedar Springs Health and Rehabilitation has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2018 9.3 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · GA · Cedartown

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 25 employers in Cedartown, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Redwood LTC Group, LLC d/b/a Premier Nursing & Rehab 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sauer Health Care 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Citrus County 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR B28 DUNBAR CENTER 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services Shady Dale 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shady Dale Ga 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sands Place Operating - 1769 Sands Pl. Marietta 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grady Electric Membership Corporation 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedartown 552 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDTWGAAN 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 727 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Valley Nursing & Rehab Center 218 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-Abs 0030 0037 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pittsburgh - 212 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa - 117 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SpringHill Suites by Marriott Eden Prairie 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kodak Weatherford 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE st stephens iga 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Springs Hatchery 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4113-41131003-R06 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.