Vocational rehabilitation agencies · Minnesota

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight

Austin, MN · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight runs at 327% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vocational rehabilitation agencies workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight: 12.4 TCR = 327% of Vocational rehabilitation agencies BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight safety composite

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight: 13.2 → 21.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 21.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.59× in 2024

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight's TCR rose 8.7 from 13.2 in 2019 to 21.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Austin, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 327% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #48/58
  • PHOTO ABC Works Caledonia
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABC Works Caledonia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight averages 12.4 TCR (327% of the Vocational rehabilitation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight TCR series: 2019=13.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.1 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=15.6 · 2024=21.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation agen establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 58 Vocational rehabilitation agen employers in Minnesota.

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight (39 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight
Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight (39 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Cedar Valley Services Inc., Top Flight has fewer employees than the Vocational rehabilitation agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 21.9 7.3 6 0 0
2023 15.6 7.8 4 0 0
2022 12.7 4.2 3 0 0
2021 11.1 11.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 13.2 6.6 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · MN · Austin

1,455 Vocational rehabilitation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Austin, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABC Works Caledonia 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Uncas 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Resources, Inc. Admininstrative, ADP, Sheltered Workshop 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peninsula Services 12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Detroit Lakes Hatchery 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Your Home Improvement Company - St Cloud 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AP Shared Services 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods - Austin 1,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods - Austin Plant 1,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hormel Foods Corporation 1,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Quality Pork Processors Inc. 1,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Dragon Products Lathrop 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Northbrook Inn 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pocomoke Farm 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Parkway 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Farris Enterprises, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Von Tobel Corporation- Schererville 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Foam 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville Hardscapes 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.