Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester

Rocheter, MI · ~100 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester: 8.8 TCR = 233% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester safety composite

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester: 0.1 → 23.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 23.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.34× in 2024

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester's TCR rose 23.6 from 0.1 in 2021 to 23.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rocheter, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 233% of ind

  • DART 11.8 DART
  • RANK #135/201
  • PHOTO The Bungalows at Nev…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Bungalows at Nevada (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester averages 8.8 TCR (233% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester TCR series: 2021=0.1 · 2022=5 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=23.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #135 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester (100 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester
Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester (100 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cedarbrook Senior living Rochester has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.7 11.8 1 1 0
2023 6.6 1.3 5 0 0
2022 5.0 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Rocheter

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Bungalows at Nevada 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pemberly Place 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere at Lexington 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10085 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jay Dee Contractors, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solomon Plumbing Co 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE FiberClass Insulation 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eden Foods Headquarters 100 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DWA2 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Microtech Knives - 321 Fanning Fields 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbiana Boiler Company, LLC 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rotochopper 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oxford New Market, LLC 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Hall (without Police) 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reynolds Sealing & Striping 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maintenance of Florida, Inc. 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.