Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) · Oregon

Center Maintenance

Portland, OR · ~147 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Center Maintenance runs at 196% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) workplace, earning a grade D.

Center Maintenance: 8.8 TCR = 196% of Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Center Maintenance safety composite

Center Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2019→2024

Center Maintenance injury rate improved

Center Maintenance's TCR fell 3.8 from 9.4 in 2019 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.4 · 2020=3.1 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=14.0 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.8 · 196% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #19/30
  • PHOTO Island County Public…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Island County Public Transportation Benefit Area dba Island Transit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Center Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Center Maintenance averages 8.8 TCR (196% of the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Center Maintenance TCR series: 2019=9.4 · 2020=3.1 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=14 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Center Maintenance falls in its industry

421 Commuter transit systems, mixe establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 30 Commuter transit systems, mixe employers in Oregon.

Center Maintenance (147 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Center Maintenance
Center Maintenance (147 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Center Maintenance has fewer employees than the Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e. median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 4.3 9 0 0
2023 14.0 8.2 17 0 0
2022 12.2 9.7 15 0 0
2020 3.1 2.5 5 0 0
2019 9.4 5.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · OR · Portland

421 Commuter transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combination) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Island County Public Transportation Benefit Area dba Island Transit 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Powell 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4257 LAND SERVICES AND SPECIAL EVENTS, GM 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7131 TEMPORARY MEDICAL DISABILITY 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Means Nursery, Inc. 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAILEY NURERIES INC 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE GLV Enterprises, Inc 147 FTE
STATE-SIZE CGC Industries Inc 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Gate Precast Company d/b/a DEX by Gate 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Milwaukee, WI Transpak 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Infinity Roofing & Sheet Metal inc 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Krieser Drywall & Insulation 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE County Building 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 15030 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bella Terra Morton Grove 147 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACLP Timber Ridge 147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.