Natural Gas Distribution · Texas

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston

Houston, TX · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Natural Gas Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston: 3.6 TCR = 303% of Natural Gas Distribution BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston safety composite

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston: 3.1 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.99× in 2024

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston's TCR rose 0.5 from 3.1 in 2020 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221210 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.6 · 303% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #71/97
  • PHOTO SAN DIMAS - 15
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAN DIMAS - 15 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston averages 3.6 TCR (303% of the Natural Gas Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston TCR series: 2020=3.1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 1.2

Where CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston falls in its industry

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 97 Natural Gas Distribution employers in Texas.

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston (73 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston
CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston (73 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.6

CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston has more employees than the Natural Gas Distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2023 8.7 6.2 7 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221210 · TX · Houston

1,153 Natural Gas Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAN DIMAS - 15 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 259-NiSource-Springfield OH 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR UGI Middletown 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlotte Resource Center PNG 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eden Green Technology 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Mill Creek 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Residential Construction 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR 790 - Queens 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OCCI, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Chester AHQ 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR East Pennsboro School 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Delta State Food Board 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsons Steel Erectors, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 536 - State College 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Montebello 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.