Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production · Arizona

Central Arizona Farming

Aguila, AZ · ~605 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Arizona Farming runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production workplace, earning a grade D.

Central Arizona Farming: 6.2 TCR = 137% of Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Arizona Farming safety composite

Central Arizona Farming scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2022→2024

Central Arizona Farming injury rate improved

Central Arizona Farming's TCR fell 3.1 from 7.0 in 2022 to 3.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.0 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111219 · Aguila, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 137% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #12/18
  • PHOTO LaBrucherie Produce,…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 138 inj
  • SIZE ~605 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LaBrucherie Produce, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Central Arizona Farming in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Arizona Farming averages 6.2 TCR (137% of the Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Arizona Farming TCR series: 2022=7 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Central Arizona Farming falls in its industry

331 Vegetable and melon farming, v establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 18 Vegetable and melon farming, v employers in Arizona.

Central Arizona Farming (605 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Arizona Farming
Central Arizona Farming (605 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Central Arizona Farming has more employees than the Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 2.0 31 3 0
2023 7.6 6.8 61 2 0
2022 7.0 3.9 46 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111219 · AZ · Aguila

331 Vegetable and melon farming, vegetable (except potato) and melon dominant crops, field, bedding plants and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LaBrucherie Produce, LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alexander Ranch, Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFFF-Belle Glade 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DiMare Ruskin, Inc. 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE PCL Construction, Inc. 605 FTE
STATE-SIZE PC - CS S 605 FTE
STATE-SIZE P.M.G. Publishing LLC 606 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASPC-Douglas 604 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA8 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayden Beverage Company - Jerome 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - IND9 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southern Living Contractors, Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Hershey Company - Lancaster Facility 605 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt & Whitney Oklahoma City Operations 605 FTE
NAT-SIZE Norton King's Daughters' Health Main Campus 605 FTE
NAT-SIZE Derrick Corporation 605 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.