Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · California

Central Coast Fence, Inc.

Grover Beach, CA · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Coast Fence, Inc. runs at 558% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade F.

Central Coast Fence, Inc.: 15.6 TCR = 558% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Coast Fence, Inc. safety composite

Central Coast Fence, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 25.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Coast Fence, Inc.: 11.1 → 25.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 25.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.66× in 2023

Central Coast Fence, Inc.'s TCR rose 14.8 from 11.1 in 2020 to 25.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Grover Beach, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.6 · 558% of ind

  • DART 25.9 DART
  • RANK #168/171
  • PHOTO TEITELBAUM CONCRETE CO
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TEITELBAUM CONCRETE CO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Central Coast Fence, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Coast Fence, Inc. averages 15.6 TCR (558% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Coast Fence, Inc. TCR series: 2020=11.1 · 2022=9.9 · 2023=25.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Central Coast Fence, Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #168 safest of 171 Fence installation (except ele employers in California.

Central Coast Fence, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Coast Fence, Inc.
Central Coast Fence, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 15.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Central Coast Fence, Inc. has fewer employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 25.9 25.9 3 1 0
2022 9.9 4.9 2 0 0
2020 11.1 11.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Grover Beach

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 18 employers in Grover Beach, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TEITELBAUM CONCRETE CO 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pine Bluff Arsenal 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnson Pools Inc. 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caliber Concrete Construction Inc 15.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miner's Ace Hardware 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY 0029 2560 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0029-0029-02560 FAC-02560-GROVER BEACH-CA 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02560 145 FTE
NAT-TCR DERBY 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McCoys Building Supply- Midland 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01710 15.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 210208-Amite Po 15.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sunrise Plumbing 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bourdeau Bros Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Village of Streator 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nuvole 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.